We filed four merits briefs this week: the Petitioner’s Reply in Reynolds v. U.S., No. 10-6549, filed on July 25, 2011; the Petitioner’s Brief in Zivotofsky v. Clinton, No. 10-699, filed on July 29, 2011; the Brief of Intervenor Respondents In No. 09-958 and California Pharmacists Respondents in No. 09-1158 in Douglas v. Independent Living Center, Nos. 09-958, 09-1158, 10-283, filed on July 29, 2011; and the Brief of Respondents Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al. in Douglas v. Independent Living Center, Nos. 09-958, 09-1158, 10-283, filed on July 29, 2011.
Articles posted in the Cockle Blog are for informational purposes only. Nothing in the Cockle Blog should be taken for legal advice. In fact, Cockle Blog articles are not a substitute for proper legal research conducted by licensed attorneys.
Cockle Blog will occasionally provide opinions on certain cases and Court procedures. These opinions should be viewed with the recognition that no one can predict with certainty how the Supreme Court will rule on particular cases. Any reliance on articles contained in Cockle Blog must be done at one's own risk.