Disclaimer
Articles posted in the Cockle Blog are for informational purposes only. Nothing in the Cockle Blog should be taken for legal advice. In fact, Cockle Blog articles are not a substitute for proper legal research conducted by licensed attorneys.
Cockle Blog will occasionally provide opinions on certain cases and Court procedures. These opinions should be viewed with the recognition that no one can predict with certainty how the Supreme Court will rule on particular cases. Any reliance on articles contained in Cockle Blog must be done at one's own risk.
New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing
We filed five merits briefs this week:
Petitioner’s Brief on the Merits in Martel v. Clair, No. 10-1265, filed on September 9, 2011
Brief for Respondent James P. Paulk in Rehberg v. Paulk, No. 10-788, filed on September 9, 2011
Brief for Respondent Richard Lee Pollard in Minneci v. Pollard, No. 10-1104, filed on September 12, 2011
Brief for Petitioner in Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC, No. 10-1195, filed on September 13, 2011
Brief for the Respondent in Gonzalez v. Thaler, No. 10-895, filed on September 14, 2011