Cockle Law Blog

Try Cockle Law Brief Printing Co. and receive up to 80% off your first order!

Oral Argument Schedule for January through March 2010

Posted: January 5th, 2010 | Author: Shon R Hopwood | Filed under: Supreme Court | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

The Supreme Court has set the oral argument schedule for January, February and March of this year.  Among the standout cases are:

  • Briscoe v. Virginia, No. 07-11191 (argument date January 11th)    In Briscoe, the Court will be confronted with the question of what procedure is required by the Confrontation Clause with regard to lab reports and whether its ruling just last Term in Melendiaz-Diaz v. Massachusetts, No. 07-591, should be reconsidered.  
  • American Needle v. NFL, No. 08-661 (argument date January 13th)  The question in this case is whether the NFL has violated anti-trust legislation through its exclusive licensing agreement with Reebok. Virtually every major sports league in the country has sided with the NFL. 
  • Skilling v. United States, No. 08-1394 (argument date March 1st)   The case involves two issues:  (1) whether former Enron executive Jeffrey Skilling’s actions constituted federal honest services fraud; (2) whether the pre-trial publicity surrounding the case violated Skilling’s right to a fair trial.
  • McDonald v. City of Chicago, No. 08-1521 (argument date March 2nd)  Perhaps the biggest case of the year will decide whether the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies with equal force to state law.  In McDonald, the Court could reconsider a notorious nineteenth century ruling.
  • Kiyemba v. Obama, No. 08-1234 (argument date March 23rd)     The Court will decide whether habeas corpus courts can release Guantanamo Bay prisoners from custody, and specifically, release from custody inside the United States. 

Overall for the Term, 75 argument slots have been filled (this includes Citizens United, No. 08-205, which is a carryover from last Term) and all but three of the cases granted for this Term have been scheduled for argument.


Court Grants Guantanamo Bay Detainee Case

Posted: October 21st, 2009 | Author: Shon R Hopwood | Filed under: Supreme Court | Tags: , , , , , | No Comments »

The Supreme Court granted three cases yesterday.  One of those cases (Kiyemba, et al., v. Obama, et al. No. 08-1234) will decide whether courts possess the authority  to release  Guantanamo Bay detainees to live on United States soil.    

Additionally, the Court vided two cases together for argument. The cases Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha v. Regal-Beloit, No. 08-1553 and Union Pacific Railroad v. Regal-Beloit, No. 08-1554, will be argued before the term ends next year.

The full order list is available here.



Disclaimer

Articles posted in the Cockle Blog are for informational purposes only. Nothing in the Cockle Blog should be taken for legal advice. In fact, Cockle Blog articles are not a substitute for proper legal research conducted by licensed attorneys.

Cockle Blog will occasionally provide opinions on certain cases and Court procedures. These opinions should be viewed with the recognition that no one can predict with certainty how the Supreme Court will rule on particular cases. Any reliance on articles contained in Cockle Blog must be done at one's own risk.

Website Design - Web Application Development - Website Marketing and Promotion