Merits Briefs

MERITS BRIEFS AND JOINT APPENDICES

The merits stage of a Supreme Court case comes with its own set of detailed rules. Merit briefs, which have a 15,000 word limit, require the normal section headings associated with a petition for writ of certiorari.  However, merits briefs also require a “Summary of Argument” that “should be a clear and concise condensation of the argument.”  Rule 24.1(h).  When brief printing is completed, counsel must send a copy of their brief to the Court and opposing counsel in a “text searchable portable document format (PDF) compatible with the latest version of Adobe Acrobat with all fonts embedded,” to the Court.  See Guidelines for Electronic Submission of Brief on the Merits.

On the merits stage, a joint appendix must be prepared in compliance with Supreme Court Rule 26. The Court requires that all joint appendices contain a table of contents “showing the parts of the record that it contains, in the order in which the parts are set out, with references to the pages of the joint appendix at which each part begins.” Rule 26.5. Furthermore, all relevant lower court docket entries “shall” be placed after the table of contents. Id.

Cockle Law Brief Printing Company can assist you every step of the way in preparing a merits brief and joint appendix. The Cockle staff is intimately familiar with the rules governing joint appendices. Just this term, Cockle helped prepare several joint appendices, including the appendices in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, No. 08-1448, and Stern v. Marshall, No. 10-179. Additionally, Cockle printed merits briefs  Camreta v. Greene; Fowler v. United States;  McComish v. Bennett; Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett; Wal-Mart v. Dukes; Snyder v. Phelps; Reynolds v. United StatesConnick v. Thompson to name a few.

Once your  merits brief is completed, we prepare the PDF version of your brief required by Rule 25.8. We also post your merits brief to our website and to our blog–The CockleBur. With Cockle Law Brief Printing Company, you can be assured that your merits brief and joint appendix are rule compliant and timely filed.

  • Testimonials

    My colleagues and I have been working with Cockle Printing for over twenty-five years. They have produced dozens of briefs for us, always with such efficiency and cordiality that a high-pressure task becomes a pleasure. I would not dream of submitting a brief to the Supreme Court without having it vetted by Cockle. Even an attorney with extensive Supreme Court experience can overlook some nuance of the Supreme Court’s rules or practice; Cockle’s intimate familiarity with both written and unwritten rules can spare you an embarrassing mistake. Also, over-familiarity with one’s document invariably produces an inflated sense of perfection. No matter how many times you and others have proofed a brief, Cockle will always find typos, punctuation and citation errors, and syntactical abominations. You do not want to be noticing those gaffes for the first time as you prepare for oral argument. I am always delighted when our opponents have been foolish enough to have their briefs printed elsewhere.
    Cathy Crosson Attorney