Author Archives: Shon R. Hopwood

Matters of Practice: Citations and Quotations in U.S. Supreme Court Briefs

I will be writing a series of posts (entitled “Matters of Practice”) on the most frequently asked questions I receive about filing briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court. This is the first post in the series. At Cockle Printing, I am often asked what citation style the Supreme Court prefers and whether the Court’s rules specify [...]

The CockleBur Is Launched

A new legal blog called “The CockleBur” has been launched.  The blog features authors such as Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California at Irvine, David Franklin of DePaul, Ron Sullivan of Harvard, Palma Strand of Creighton, and Dan Ortiz of the University of Virginia, just to name a few.  The CockleBur is hosted by Cockle Law Brief Printing [...]

Court Grants Two Cockle-Printed Petitions and Four Others

On Monday, the Supreme Court granted six petitions for certiorari in five cases.  Two of those petitions were printed here at Cockle. The first was the petition in Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., No. 08-1314. The questions presented in that case are: 1. Where Congress has provided that compliance with a federal motor [...]

What the Experts Say on Constructing the Argument Section for a Petition for Writ of Certiorari

This post is the first in a series of three discussing what Supreme Court experts suggest when preparing a successful petition for writ of certiorari.  The first will address the “argument” section, the second the “questions presented” section and the third, tips and techniques to use when writing the cert petition.  While Supreme Court experts [...]

City of Reno v. Conn The Cert. Petition

After conducting research on decisions written by particular federal appellate judges that are later granted by the Court, I am of the belief that perhaps Supreme Court Rule 10 should officially be modified. While a conflict among the lower courts remains the prevailing reason why the Court grants cert, there are other certworthy factors not [...]

Topside Brief and Joint Appendix in Michigan v. Bryant

The Petitioner’s Brief  and Joint Appendix  in Michigan v. Bryant, No. 09-150, were filed on April 30th. At issue in Bryant, is whether statements made by a wounded citizen regarding the circumstances of a shooting are testimonial statements implicating the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause.

Court Grants Two Petitions

The Court granted two cert petitions this morning. In Schwarzenegger et al. v. Entertainment Merchants Association et al., No. 08-1448, the Court was asked to decide whether the First Amendment allows video games with offensive conduct to be sold to minors and whether the State of California’s regulation prohibiting the sale of violent video games must [...]

Topside Merits Brief in Los Angeles County v. Humphries

Today, the Petitioner’s merits brief was filed in Los Angeles County v. Humphries, No. 09-350.  The brief can be viewed here. The questions presented in Humphries are: Are claims for declaratory relief against a local public entity subject to the requirement of Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978) that the plaintiff [...]

Court Grants Four Petitions, Hears Argument in Christian Legal Society and Quon

The Court granted four cert petitions yesterday morning.  The issues presented in those petitions included bankruptcy matters, the Court of Federal Claims’ jurisdiction, the first-sale doctrine of the Copyright Act and in what circumstances an employer is liable based on the unlawful intent of officials who caused or influenced but did not make the ultimate [...]

Quon Reply Brief

The merits reply brief in City of Ontario v. Quon, No. 08-1332, was filed yesterday.  The brief can be viewed here.