Try Cockle Law Brief Printing Co. and receive up to $105.00 off your first order!
New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing
New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing
New Petitions Recently Filed by Cockle Printing
New Petitions Recently Filed by Cockle Printing
New Merits Brief Filed by Cockle Printing
We filed a merits brief this week: Reply Brief for Petitioner in Setser v. U.S., No. 10-7387, filed on November 10, 2011.
New Petitions Recently Filed by Cockle Printing
New Petitions Recently Filed by Cockle Printing
Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum
Lawrence J. Dickson, Ph.D., has filed his Brief of Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners in Florida v. DHHS, No. 11-400, and you can read it here.
New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing
We filed two merits briefs this week:
Reply Brief for Petitioner in Nat’l Meat Ass’n v. Harris, No. 10-224, filed on November 1, 2011
Brief of Respondents Ctr. for Creative Voices in Media and The Future of Music Coalition in FCC v. Fox, No. 10-1293, filed on November 3, 2011
New Petitions Recently Filed by Cockle Printing
Stewart v. Oregon, filed on October 28, 2011***********
Nat’l Org. for Marriage v. McKee, filed on November 2, 2011
Noriega v. Torres, filed on November 2, 2011
Carson v. U.S., filed on November 3, 2011
Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum
The Pacific Legal Foundation, Matthew Sissel, Americans for Free Choice in Medicine, and The Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence have filed their Amicus Curiae Brief in Virginia v. Sebelius, No. 11-420, and you can read it here. Timothy Sandefur, counsel of record for the amici and regular contributor to The Cocklebur, has posted his comments on the brief and the issues here.
Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum
The American Center for Law & Justice, 105 Members of the United States Congress, and the Supreme Court Committee to Declare Obamacare Unconstitutional have filed their Amici Curiae Brief in Florida v. HHS, No. 11-400, and you can read it here.
Disclaimer
Articles posted in the Cockle Blog are for informational purposes only. Nothing in the Cockle Blog should be taken for legal advice. In fact, Cockle Blog articles are not a substitute for proper legal research conducted by licensed attorneys.
Cockle Blog will occasionally provide opinions on certain cases and Court procedures. These opinions should be viewed with the recognition that no one can predict with certainty how the Supreme Court will rule on particular cases. Any reliance on articles contained in Cockle Blog must be done at one's own risk.
New Petitions Recently Filed by Cockle Printing